Manual
Summary
This section provides a discretionary exemption where disclosure of a
record could reasonably be expected to prejudice the conduct of
intergovernmental relations or reveal information received in confidence
from another government.
"Other governments" include the:
- Government of Ontario (for MFIPPA institutions);
- Another provincial or territorial government;
- A government of a foreign country or state; or
- An international organization of states (e.g. United Nations).
This section also applies to records received in confidence from
agencies or boards of these governments. For example, the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police is an agency of the federal government. Municipal and
regional police services are law enforcement agencies of the Government of
Ontario, because the Police Services Act (PSA) is the governing
legislation with respect to police services in Ontario and the PSA is
administered by the Solicitor General of Ontario. Further, this subsection
requires the relations in question to be intergovernmental rather than
relations among agencies of the same government.
For this exemption to apply, a three-part test must be met: 1) the
records must reveal information received from another government or its
agencies; 2) the information must have been received by an institution;
and 3) the information must have been received in confidence.
This exemption requires that there be a reasonable expectation of harm
and the institution is expected to establish a clear and direct linkage
between the disclosure of the information and the harm alleged. The
expectation that disclosure of a record could prejudice the conduct of
intergovernmental relations or reveal information received in confidence
by the institution from another government or its agencies, must not be
fanciful, imaginary or contrived, but rather one that is based on reason.
The compelling public interest provision in s.23
FIPPA / s.16 MFIPPA
applies to this exemption. However, FIPPA institutions must obtain the
approval of the Executive Council (Cabinet) before disclosing any
information to which this exemption applies.
Differences Between FIPPA and MFIPPA
There are some differences in the wording and provisions of this
exemption between the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
(FIPPA) and the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy
Act (MFIPPA). For example:
Section 9 (2) MFIPPA explicitly states that local institutions shall
disclose a record to which the exemption applies if the government, agency
or organization from which the record was received consents to the
disclosure. There is no similar expressed provision in s. 15 FIPPA.
This exemption does not apply to records received in confidence by one
municipality/local board from another municipality/local board. The Act
provides that an access request can be transferred to the originating
municipality or local board if that institution has a greater interest in
the records Chapter 3
(Access Procedures) for a discussion on this transfer provision.
Prejudice to Intergovernmental Relations
This exemption applies if there is a reasonable expectation of
prejudice to the conduct of intergovernmental relations.
"Intergovernmental" extends to the relationship that the
Government of Ontario or an institution has with other governments. The
term "relations" includes not only current negotiations, but
general and ongoing exchanges with other governments.
Confidential Information
The purpose of this exemption is to ensure that governments under
MFIPPA/FIPPA will continue to obtain access to records which other
governments could otherwise be unwilling to supply without having this
protection from disclosure. In order for this provision to apply, the case
for confidentiality must be made by the supplying government, not the
receiving government.
|